Ethics of Author
1. Authors must certify that the submitted article is new, has never been published before, and is not in the process of being considered for publication in other journals.
2. Authors should carefully check the sources of referenced documents, including the use of language in the article, which is the responsibility of the author.
3. Authors must not provide distorted or false information, and all persons whose names appear in the link slot gacor in the article must have actually participated in the research.
4. Authors should study and prepare the article in accordance with the format specified in the instructions for preparing the manuscript strictly.
5. Authors must submit research that has a wide impact that is not research at the institutional level.

Ethics of Editors
1. Editors are responsible for reviewing every article submitted for consideration for publication to the journal, including checking the quality of the article in the quality assessment process before publication, and not publishing articles that have been published elsewhere.
2. Editors are responsible for considering the consistency of the article content with the objectives of the journal and must strictly follow the various processes of the journal.
3. Editors should have a system that ensures that articles submitted to the journal will be kept confidential during the evaluation process. The author's information must not be disclosed and the personal information of the article reviewers must be protected.
4. The editor must maintain the accuracy of the study report. The article must be checked seriously for plagiarism. When the editor finds plagiarism, the evaluation must be suspended and the author must be contacted to consider withdrawing or rejecting the publication.
5. The editor must use the principle of article reviewing based on academic reasons. There must be no bias towards the author and the article being reviewed in any case.
6. The editor must not have any conflict of interest with the author or the qualified person, whether it is for their own academic work or for business benefits.
7. The editor must maintain the journal's standards and develop the journal to be of quality at all times.
8. The editor must be willing to correct publication errors, clarify, and apologize if necessary.

Ethics of Reviewers
1. The article reviewer must not disclose the information of the article to other unrelated persons during the article evaluation period and until the article is published.
2. The article reviewer must evaluate the article without bias and without any other hidden intentions. Articles must be considered based on academic principles and reasons.
3. Article assessors must not have conflicts of interest with the authors and must not seek benefits from the academic work that they have assessed. If article assessors have conflicts of interest with the authors, they must inform the journal editor and refuse to assess the article.
4. Article assessors should assess articles in their fields of expertise and must be able to provide useful comments and suggestions for improving the article, with the quality of the article as the primary consideration.
5. Article assessors must inform the editor if they find that any part of the article is plagiarized or duplicates the work of others.
6. Article assessors must maintain the article assessment period within the specified time frame.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IhoK-ZrmAQvqF4AINAl7OgHsECKKce4DEKdh_Q8ZSmw/edit?usp=sharing