Development of simulated battlefield scenario maps

Authors

  • Thanet Lertjameekorn Department of Computer, Faculty of Information Technology, Thepsatri Rajabhat University

Keywords:

Simulated battlefield scenario maps, UAV, Aerial image processing

Abstract

This research aimed to develop a simulated combat area mapping system covering at least 30 square kilometers using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) technology combined with aerial photogrammetry processing. The study was conducted at Phu Lamai training field in Nakhon Ratchasima Province, utilizing a DJI Mavic Pro 2 drone, Pix4DCapture software for flight planning, and WebOpenDroneMap for map processing.The research methodology involved testing various flight configurations including overlap and sidelap settings of 60/60, 70/70, and 80/80, flight altitudes of 300 and 400 meters, and image resolutions of 7 and 50 centimeters per pixel. Ground Control Points (GCP) were employed to enhance coordinate accuracy.Results demonstrated that the 60/60 overlap configuration at 300-meter altitude provided optimal performance when considering the balance between flight time (450 minutes), processing time, and map quality. Maps with 7 cm/pixel resolution required 1,400 minutes processing time with 5.6 GB file size, while 50 cm/pixel resolution maps required only 110 minutes with 222 MB file size. The use of at least 5 GCP significantly reduced coordinate deviation. The 50 cm/pixel resolution maps proved suitable for installation in artillery fire control systems and tactical-level combat planning.The research contributes valuable insights for military mapping applications, demonstrating that UAV-based mapping technology can effectively produce high-quality tactical maps with optimized resource utilization. The findings provide practical guidelines for selecting appropriate flight parameters and resolution settings based on specific operational requirements and resource constraints.

References

W. Budiharto, E. Irwansyah, J. S. Suroso, A. Chowanda, H. Ngarianto, and A. A. S. Gunawan, “Mapping and 3D modelling using quadrotor drone and GIS software,” Journal of Big Data, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Jan. 2021.

A. Skondras et al., “UAV mapping and 3D modeling as a tool for promotion and management of the urban space,” Drones, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 115, May. 2022.

T. Minohara, “Map view for remote control of drones,” in Proc. IEEE/AIAA 42nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC 2023), Barcelona, Spain, Oct. 1-5, 2023

K. Zhang, H. Okazawa, K. Hayashi, T. Hayashi, L. Fiwa, and S. Maskey, “Optimization of Ground Control Point Distribution for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photogrammetry for Inaccessible Fields,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 9505, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ su14159505.

G. Muradás Odriozola et al., “Automating ground control point detection in drone imagery: From computer vision to deep learning,” Remote Sensing, vol. 16, pp. 794, Feb. 2024.

G. Vacca, “WEB Open Drone Map (WebODM) a software open source to photogrammetry process,” in Proc. FIG Working Week 2020: Smart Surveyors for Land and Water Management, Art. no. 10728, Amsterdam, Netherlands, May. 2020.

A. Ansari, B. Sah, H. Dhungel, and D. Gautam, “3D Drone Mapping,” Journal of Innovative Image Processing, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.36548/jiip.2023.1.001.

K. Lim and S. Jeong, “Acquiring Precise Coordinates of Ground Targets through GCP Geometric Correction of Captured Images in UAS,” Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 129–138, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.9766/ kimst. 2023.26.2.129.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

[1]
T. Lertjameekorn, “Development of simulated battlefield scenario maps”, itechtru, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 15–23, Jun. 2026.

Issue

Section

Research Article